Benchmark: Teste validação aqui 2

HTML Preparation code:

<div>Testing</div>
<div id="test"></div>

Script Preparation code:

var settings = []

Tests:

Settings Test one
const testSettings = settings.map((setting) => ({ [setting.key]: setting.value })) || []
Settings Test two
const testSettings = settings.reduce((acc, item) => { acc.push({ [setting.key]: setting.value }); return acc; }, [])

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Settings Test one
Settings Test two

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what's being tested in this benchmark.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is a JSON object that represents the test case. It has three main parts:

* `Name` and `Description`: These are metadata about the benchmark, but not relevant to the actual testing.
* `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`: These are code snippets that are executed before running the benchmark. The script preparation code defines an array called `settings`, which is used as input for the test cases.

The HTML preparation code creates a basic HTML structure with two div elements: one contains the text "Testing" and another has an ID of "test".

**Test Cases**

There are two individual test cases, each represented by a JSON object. They have the same `Benchmark Definition` but differ in how they process the `settings` array.

1. **Settings Test One**
```javascript
const testSettings = settings.map((setting) => ({ [setting.key]: setting.value })) || [];
```
This test case uses the `map()` method to create a new array from the `settings` array. It maps each object in the array to a new object with the same key-value pairs, but wrapped in square brackets (`[]`) as property names.

2. **Settings Test Two**
```javascript
const testSettings = settings.reduce((acc, item) => {
    acc.push({ [setting.key]: setting.value });
    return acc;
}, []);
```
This test case uses the `reduce()` method to iterate over the `settings` array and create a new array from it. It accumulates the objects in the array into an initial empty array (`[]`) using the `push()` method.

**Comparison of Options**

The two test cases compare different approaches to processing the `settings` array:

* **Map**: This approach creates a new array with transformed objects, which can be more efficient for large datasets.
* **Reduce**: This approach accumulates objects in an array, which can be more memory-efficient than creating a new array.

**Pros and Cons**

* **Map**:
	+ Pros: More efficient for large datasets, easier to read and understand.
	+ Cons: May create unnecessary intermediate arrays, which can impact performance.
* **Reduce**:
	+ Pros: Can be more memory-efficient, especially for small datasets or when working with large objects.
	+ Cons: Can be less intuitive for some developers, may require more code to achieve the same result.

**Other Considerations**

* The benchmark results are reported as `ExecutionsPerSecond`, which suggests that the test is measuring the number of iterations performed per second. This can help identify performance bottlenecks in the JavaScript engine.
* The `Browser`, `DevicePlatform`, and `OperatingSystem` fields suggest that the benchmark is running on a specific browser-OS combination, which can affect the results.

**Library**

There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, the use of `map()` and `reduce()` suggests that JavaScript's built-in array methods are being used.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The code uses standard JavaScript constructs like `var`, `const`, `let`, `array methods` (e.g., `map()`, `reduce()`), and basic HTML structure.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 127 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Settings Test one	10314711.0 Ops/sec
Settings Test two	4361599.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Teste validação aqui 2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Settings Test one vs Settings Test two

Created: 7 months ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Settings Test one

Settings Test two

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):