<div>Testing</div>
<div id="test"></div>
var xxx = {}
Object.values(xxx).length === 0
Object.values(xxx).length === 0
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Object.values | |
Object.keys |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Object.values | 7839848.0 Ops/sec |
Object.keys | 7856841.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents two test cases that compare the performance of Object.keys()
and Object.values()
methods in retrieving values from an empty object (xxx
).
Options being compared:
Pros and Cons of each approach:
Object.getOWNProperty()
.Library and its purpose:
In this case, there is no explicit library mentioned. However, Object.keys()
and Object.values()
are built-in methods of the JavaScript Object prototype.
Special JS feature or syntax:
There doesn't seem to be any special features or syntax used in these benchmark definitions. They rely solely on standard JavaScript functionality.
Other alternatives:
If you're looking for alternative approaches, you could consider using:
Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics and use cases, so it's essential to consider your specific requirements before choosing an approach.
Benchmark preparation code:
The provided script preparation code creates an empty object xxx
using var xxx = {}
. This sets up a simple scenario for testing the behavior of Object.keys()
and Object.values()
. The HTML preparation code includes two <div>
elements, which are used to render the test results.