<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.22.0/moment.min.js'></script>
const now = moment().valueOf()
const now = new Date().valueOf()
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
moment | |
native |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
moment | 2014127.9 Ops/sec |
native | 4413632.5 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and explore the JavaScript microbenchmark.
What is being tested?
MeasureThat.net is testing two approaches to calculating the current timestamp: Moment.js, a popular JavaScript library for working with dates, and the native JavaScript Date object.
The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches in calculating the number of milliseconds since the Unix Epoch (January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 UTC).
Options being compared
There are two options being compared:
Pros and cons of each approach
Moment.js:
Pros:
Cons:
Native JavaScript Date object:
Pros:
Cons:
Special JS feature or syntax
There are no special JS features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some modern JavaScript engines, such as V8 (used by Chrome), have some built-in optimizations for date-related operations.
Other alternatives
If you're looking for alternative libraries to Moment.js, some popular options include:
If you prefer not to use a library, you can also consider using a simple timestamp calculation like this:
const now = Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000);
This approach is lightweight and compact but may require more manual handling of dates and locales.
In summary, the benchmark is testing the performance of two approaches to calculating the current timestamp: Moment.js and the native JavaScript Date object. The choice between these two options depends on your specific use case and priorities, such as ease of use, performance, and compatibility with different browsers or environments.