Benchmark: Spread operator vs apply vs normal vs destruct - V2

Script Preparation code:

function test(a , b , c , d , e) { return a + b + c + d + e }
var using = (new Array(5)).fill(null).map((e, i) => (i));
var [a , b , c , d , e] = using

Tests:

spread
test(...using);
apply
test.apply(null, using)
normal
test(using[0] , using[1] , using[2] , using[3] , using[4])
destruct
test(a , b, c , d , e)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
spread
apply
normal
destruct

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one month ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/123.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 123 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
spread	11364940.0 Ops/sec
apply	11115250.0 Ops/sec
normal	4394982.0 Ops/sec
destruct	4463496.0 Ops/sec

Spread operator vs apply vs normal vs destruct - V2 (version: 0)

Compare the differing ways you can call a function with arbitrary arguments dynamically

Comparing performance of: spread vs apply vs normal vs destruct

Created: one month ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

spread

apply

normal

destruct

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A