<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
<div id='el'></div>
$('#el').addClass('red');
$('#el')[0].classList.add('red');
document.getElementById('el').classList.add('red');
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
jquery and js | |
js |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
jquery and js | 1953840.4 Ops/sec |
js | 1817418.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help explain the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares two approaches: using jQuery's addClass
method and using JavaScript's native classList.add
method on an HTML element.
What is tested?
In this benchmark, we're testing how long it takes for each approach to add a class "red" to an HTML element (<div id="el">
) that has been previously loaded with jQuery. The test cases are:
$('#el')[0].classList.add('red');
: This uses jQuery's addClass
method.document.getElementById('el').classList.add('red');
: This uses JavaScript's native classList.add
method.Options compared
The two options being compared are:
addClass
methodclassList.add
methodPros and Cons of each approach:
addClass
method:classList.add
method:Library used
The jquery.js
library is loaded in the HTML preparation code, which is required for the jQuery-based test case. The library provides a convenient API for working with HTML elements and DOM manipulation.
Special JS feature or syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark, as both approaches rely on standard JavaScript concepts like classList
and document.getElementById
.
Other alternatives
If you were to add more test cases or consider alternative approaches, some possibilities could include:
classList.add
.Keep in mind that this benchmark is primarily focused on comparing the performance of two specific approaches, rather than exploring a wide range of alternatives.