Benchmark: or vs some 2 - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

or
const testObj = { prop1: false, prop2: false, prop3: true}; const orResult = testObj.prop1 || testObj.prop2 || testObj.prop3;
some 1
const testObj = { prop1: 'val1', prop2: 'val2', prop3: 'val3'}; ['prop1', 'prop2', 'prop3'].some(val => testObj[val]);
some 2
const testObj = { prop1: 'val1', prop2: 'val2', prop3: 'val3'}; [testObj.prop1, testObj.prop2, testObj.prop3].some(val => val);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
or
some 1
some 2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring performance is a crucial aspect of software development, and having a reliable tool like MeasureThat.net helps ensure that your code runs efficiently across different browsers and devices.

The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition for three individual test cases:

1. **"or"**: This test case measures the performance of the "OR" operator (`||`) in JavaScript. The `testObj` object contains three properties: `prop1`, `prop2`, and `prop3`. Two of these properties are set to `false`, while one is set to `true`. The benchmark definition uses the OR operator to check if any of these properties are truthy, and measures how many executions per second this operation yields.

In terms of options compared:

*   **OR Operator (`||`)**: This is a basic logical operator in JavaScript that returns `true` if at least one operand is true. It's often used for conditional statements or simple checks.
*   **Some Method**: The `some()` method is another way to check for truthiness in an array. Unlike the OR operator, it doesn't short-circuit and will iterate over all elements until a truthy value is found.

Pros and Cons of these approaches:

**OR Operator (`||`)**:
    *   Pros: Simple to implement, straightforward logic.
    *   Cons: Can be slow for large arrays due to its sequential nature.

**Some Method**: 
    *   Pros: More efficient than the OR operator in many cases, as it stops iterating once a truthy value is found.
    *   Cons: Requires an array and can be more complex to implement.

Other considerations:

*   **Array iteration**: Both methods involve iterating over the elements of the `testObj` object or array. This can impact performance depending on the size of the data.
*   **Browser differences**: The behavior of these operators may vary across different browsers due to their implementation.

Regarding library usage, there's no explicit mention of any libraries in the provided benchmark definition.

As for special JavaScript features or syntax, there isn't anything notable mentioned in this specific benchmark. However, if you're interested in exploring other advanced features like async/await, generators, or WebAssembly, those would require separate benchmark definitions and testing approaches.

For comparison with MeasureThat.net, here are some alternatives:

*   **Benchmark.js**: A popular JavaScript library for running benchmarks.
*   **Benchmarked**: A simple benchmarking tool for Node.js applications.
*   **jsperf.com**: An online platform that allows you to create and run custom JavaScript benchmarks.
*   **Benchmark.NET** (C#): A .NET library for writing high-performance benchmarks.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 121 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
or	172305344.0 Ops/sec
some 1	141097568.0 Ops/sec
some 2	150787376.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

or vs some 2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: or vs some 1 vs some 2

Created: 8 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

or

some 1

some 2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):