Benchmark: or vs some - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

or
const testObj = { prop1: 'val1', prop2: 'val2', prop3: 'val3'}; const orResult = testObj.prop1 || testObj.prop2 || testObj.prop3;
some 1
const testObj = { prop1: 'val1', prop2: 'val2', prop3: 'val3'}; ['prop1', 'prop2', 'prop3'].some(val => testObj[val]);
some 2
const testObj = { prop1: 'val1', prop2: 'val2', prop3: 'val3'}; [testObj.prop1, testObj.prop2, testObj.prop3].some(val => val);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
or
some 1
some 2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested in each benchmark.

**Benchmark Definition**

The `Benchmark Definition` field is where users can define their custom JavaScript microbenchmarks. In this case, there are three benchmarks defined:

1. `or vs some`: This benchmark compares the performance of using the `||` operator (also known as the "OR" operator) versus the `some()` method with a callback function.
2. `some 1` and `some 2`: These two benchmarks compare the performance of using the `some()` method with a callback function, but with slightly different syntax:
	* `some 1`: Uses the `testObj[val]` syntax to access nested properties.
	* `some 2`: Uses the `val` variable directly in the callback function.

**Options Compared**

In each benchmark, we have two options being compared:

* The first option uses the OR operator (`||`) or the `some()` method with a callback function.
* The second option uses the `some()` method with a different syntax (either by accessing nested properties or using the variable directly in the callback function).

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

1. **OR Operator (`||`)**:
	* Pros: Simple, straightforward, and widely supported.
	* Cons: May not be as efficient as other approaches, especially for larger datasets or more complex logic.
2. **some() method with callback function**:
	* Pros: More flexible and powerful than the OR operator, can handle nested properties and more complex logic.
	* Cons: Requires a callback function, which can add overhead.

**Library**

In none of the provided benchmark definitions is there any explicit use of a library. However, it's worth noting that the `some()` method is a built-in JavaScript method that doesn't rely on external libraries.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

There are no special JS features or syntax being used in these benchmarks beyond what's typically considered standard JavaScript. However, some might argue that using a callback function with `some()` is a slightly more advanced technique than simply using the OR operator.

**Other Alternatives**

If you were to rewrite these benchmarks using alternative approaches, here are a few options:

* Using `reduce()` method: Instead of using `some()`, you could use `reduce()` to iterate over the properties and accumulate a result.
* Using `forEach()` method with a callback function: You could use `forEach()` instead of `some()` and still achieve similar results.
* Using a more complex loop structure (e.g., `for...of` or `while` loops): Depending on the specific requirements, you might choose to use a more traditional loop structure instead of relying on array methods like `some()`.

Keep in mind that these alternatives would likely change the performance characteristics and behavior of the benchmarks.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 9 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 121 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
or	159491328.0 Ops/sec
some 1	142864912.0 Ops/sec
some 2	150037328.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

or vs some (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: or vs some 1 vs some 2

Created: 9 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

or

some 1

some 2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):