const testObj = { prop1: 'val1', prop2: 'val2', prop3: 'val3'};
const orResult = testObj.prop1 || testObj.prop2 || testObj.prop3;
const testObj = { prop1: 'val1', prop2: 'val2', prop3: 'val3'};
['prop1', 'prop2', 'prop3'].some(val => testObj[val]);
const testObj = { prop1: 'val1', prop2: 'val2', prop3: 'val3'};
[testObj.prop1, testObj.prop2, testObj.prop3].some(val => val);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
or | |
some 1 | |
some 2 |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
or | 159491328.0 Ops/sec |
some 1 | 142864912.0 Ops/sec |
some 2 | 150037328.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested in each benchmark.
Benchmark Definition
The Benchmark Definition
field is where users can define their custom JavaScript microbenchmarks. In this case, there are three benchmarks defined:
or vs some
: This benchmark compares the performance of using the ||
operator (also known as the "OR" operator) versus the some()
method with a callback function.some 1
and some 2
: These two benchmarks compare the performance of using the some()
method with a callback function, but with slightly different syntax:some 1
: Uses the testObj[val]
syntax to access nested properties.some 2
: Uses the val
variable directly in the callback function.Options Compared
In each benchmark, we have two options being compared:
||
) or the some()
method with a callback function.some()
method with a different syntax (either by accessing nested properties or using the variable directly in the callback function).Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
||
):Library
In none of the provided benchmark definitions is there any explicit use of a library. However, it's worth noting that the some()
method is a built-in JavaScript method that doesn't rely on external libraries.
Special JS Features or Syntax
There are no special JS features or syntax being used in these benchmarks beyond what's typically considered standard JavaScript. However, some might argue that using a callback function with some()
is a slightly more advanced technique than simply using the OR operator.
Other Alternatives
If you were to rewrite these benchmarks using alternative approaches, here are a few options:
reduce()
method: Instead of using some()
, you could use reduce()
to iterate over the properties and accumulate a result.forEach()
method with a callback function: You could use forEach()
instead of some()
and still achieve similar results.for...of
or while
loops): Depending on the specific requirements, you might choose to use a more traditional loop structure instead of relying on array methods like some()
.Keep in mind that these alternatives would likely change the performance characteristics and behavior of the benchmarks.