var array = new Array(5000).fill('1').map(() => Math.random());
var strJson = JSON.stringify(array);
var strComma = array.join(',');
JSON.parse(strJson);
strComma.split(',').map(Number)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
JSON.parse | |
String.split |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
JSON.parse | 2886.6 Ops/sec |
String.split | 2013.4 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test between two approaches: JSON.parse
and string.split
for parsing an array of numbers.
What is being tested?
Two options are compared:
The test creates an array of 5000 numbers with random values, converts it to a JSON string (strJson
), and then compares the execution times of:
JSON.parse
string.split
Options compared:
JSON.parse
can be more readable and concise for parsing JSON data.String.split
can be less intuitive for parsing arrays of numbers.Library and purpose:
In this test, the JSON
object is used as a library to parse the JSON string. The JSON.stringify()
method is also part of the JavaScript standard library, but it's not explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition.
Special JS feature or syntax:
There are no special features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark.
Other alternatives:
If you were to modify this test, other approaches you could consider include:
JSON.parse
, use a simple loop to parse each number in the array.Here's an example of how you could modify the benchmark definition to include these alternatives:
"[
{
"Benchmark Definition": "for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) { result[i] = array[i]; }"
},
{
"Benchmark Definition": "_.map(array, Number)"
}
]"
This would add two more test cases to the benchmark: using a loop to parse each number in the array and using Lodash's map()
function to parse the numbers.