Benchmark: reduce creation2

Script Preparation code:

var data = Array.from({ length: 10000 }).map((_, idx) => idx)

Tests:

spread insert
data.reduce((acc, val) => ({ ...acc, [val]: val }), {})
assign insert
data.reduce((acc, val) => Object.assign(acc, {[val]: val}))
map
Object.fromEntries(data.reduce((acc, val) => acc.set(val, val), new Map()))
mutation
data.reduce((acc, val) => acc[val] = val, {})

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
spread insert
assign insert
map
mutation

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Overview**

MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided JSON data represents the benchmark definition, test cases, and latest benchmark results.

**Benchmark Definition JSON**

The benchmark definition JSON provides information about the script preparation code and HTML preparation code for the benchmark. In this case:

* Script Preparation Code: `var data = Array.from({ length: 10000 }).map((_, idx) => idx)`
	+ Creates an array of 10,000 elements using `Array.from()` with a generator function that maps each index to its value.
* HTML Preparation Code: None
	+ No HTML code is provided for preparation.

**Individual Test Cases**

The individual test cases are defined in the "Benchmark Definition" section. Each test case represents a different approach to creating an object from the `data` array:

1. **Test Case 1:** `data.reduce((acc, val) => ({ ...acc, [val]: val }), {})`
	+ Uses `reduce()` to create an object where each key is the value from the array and its corresponding value.
	+ Approach: Creating an object using `reduce()` with a spread operator (`{ ... }`).
2. **Test Case 2:** `data.reduce((acc, val) => Object.assign(acc, {[val]: val}))`
	+ Uses `reduce()` to create an object where each key is the value from the array and its corresponding value.
	+ Approach: Using `Object.assign()` to assign values to existing keys in the accumulator object.
3. **Test Case 3:** `Object.fromEntries(data.reduce((acc, val) => acc.set(val, val), new Map()))`
	+ Uses `reduce()` to create a map where each key-value pair comes from the array.
	+ Approach: Using `Object.fromEntries()` to convert the map into an object.
4. **Test Case 4:** `data.reduce((acc, val) => acc[val] = val, {})`
	+ Uses `reduce()` to set each value in the accumulator object at the corresponding index.
	+ Approach: Creating a mutable object by assigning values using bracket notation (`[]`).

**Library and Syntax**

None of the provided test cases use any libraries or custom syntax.

**Other Alternatives**

Here are some alternative approaches to creating an object from the `data` array:

* Using a `for...of` loop: `const obj = {}; for (const val of data) { obj[val] = val; }`
* Using `Array.prototype.forEach()`: `const obj = {}; data.forEach((val, idx) => { obj[idx] = val; });`
* Using `Lodash's `set()` function`: `const _ = require('lodash'); const obj = _.set({}, data);`

Each approach has its pros and cons:

* Approach 1 (reduce with spread): Fast and concise, but may not be as readable for large arrays.
* Approach 2 (assign using Object.assign()): May be slower due to the repeated assignment of values, but is more explicit and readable.
* Approach 3 (fromEntries): May not work in older browsers or environments that don't support `Object.fromEntries()`, but is a concise and modern way to create an object from a map.

Approach 4 (mutation with bracket notation) can be problematic if the array size increases, as it may lead to slow performance due to the repeated lookups.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 9 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 121 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
spread insert	140.5 Ops/sec
assign insert	263.0 Ops/sec
map	1396.7 Ops/sec
mutation	752.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

reduce creation2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: spread insert vs assign insert vs map vs mutation

Created: 9 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

spread insert

assign insert

map

mutation

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):