var array = Array.from(Array(10000).keys())
var itemsToRemove = 100
array = array.slice(itemsToRemove)
array.splice(0, itemsToRemove)
for (let i = 0 ; i < itemsToRemove ; i++) array.shift()
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
array.slice() | |
array.splice() | |
array.shift() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
array.slice() | 85600032.0 Ops/sec |
array.splice() | 55750896.0 Ops/sec |
array.shift() | 5554648.5 Ops/sec |
Measuring JavaScript performance is essential, especially when it comes to array manipulation methods like slice()
, splice()
, and shift()
. Let's break down the provided benchmark definition, test cases, and results.
Benchmark Definition: The test compares three methods for removing elements from an array:
array.slice(itemsToRemove)
: Returns a new array containing all elements except the first itemsToRemove
elements.array.splice(0, itemsToRemove)
: Removes itemsToRemove
elements from the beginning of the array and returns an array of removed elements.for (let i = 0 ; i < itemsToRemove ; i++) array.shift()
: Removes each element at index 0 using the shift()
method.Options Compared: The benchmark compares three different approaches:
slice()
: A more efficient approach, as it creates a new array and returns it.splice()
: A less efficient approach, as it modifies the original array and returns an array of removed elements.shift()
: An even less efficient approach, as it uses a loop to remove each element individually.Pros and Cons:
slice()
: Pros:splice()
, as it creates a new array.shift()
.splice()
: Pros:shift()
:However, these approaches have significant performance differences:
slice()
is generally faster due to its use of a fixed-size allocation in JavaScript's V8 engine.splice()
incurs more overhead due to the allocation of an array for removed elements.shift()
uses more iterations, making it slower.Library:
In this benchmark, no libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, Array.from()
is used in the script preparation code to create a large array with 10,000 elements, which serves as the input for the tests.
Special JS Feature/Syntax: None of the provided benchmarks utilize special JavaScript features or syntax that would affect the results.
Now that we've covered these aspects, let's take a look at some alternative methods:
filter()
: Instead of removing items from an array using slice()
, splice()
, or shift()
, you can use the filter()
method to create a new array containing only the desired elements.map()
and concat()
: Another approach is to use map()
to create a new array with the desired elements, then concatenate it using concat()
.These alternatives will be slower than the original methods used in the benchmark:
filter()
: Less efficient due to its use of an iterative loop.map()
and concat()
: Also less efficient due to its use of more iterations and function calls.In conclusion, when it comes to array manipulation, slice()
is usually the most efficient approach, followed by splice()
, and then shift()
. However, there are other alternatives that can be used in specific situations.