"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.".replace(/ /g, "+");
"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.".replaceAll(" ", "+");
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
replace regex | |
replace All |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
replace regex | 347127.9 Ops/sec |
replace All | 316217.3 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
Overview
The provided benchmark measures the performance of two approaches to replace whitespace characters with a special string in a given input string: replace
(using a regular expression) and replaceAll
(a method provided by some JavaScript libraries).
Options Compared
There are two options being compared:
/ /g, "+"
): This approach uses the replace()
method with a regular expression to replace whitespace characters. The / /g
part specifies that all occurrences of whitespace should be replaced, and the \+
is the replacement string.replaceAll()
Method: This approach uses a method called replaceAll()
, which is not a standard JavaScript method. However, some libraries like jQuery provide this method for convenience.Pros and Cons
replace()
methods.replaceAll()
Method:Library
The replaceAll()
method is likely provided by the jQuery library. However, MeasureThat.net does not explicitly mention that jQuery is required for this benchmark to run. If you're using a different library or implementation of this method, you might see different results.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in these benchmarks. They are focused on comparing the performance of two specific approaches to string replacement.
Other Alternatives
If you want to compare other string replacement methods, you could consider:
replace()
with a simple string: Instead of using regular expressions, you could use the replace()
method with a simple string, like "_"
.In summary, MeasureThat.net provides a simple benchmark to compare the performance of two approaches to string replacement: regular expressions and the replaceAll()
method. Understanding the pros and cons of each approach can help you make informed decisions about which method to use in your own projects.