Benchmark: replaceAll vs regex replace pt2

Tests:

replace regex
"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.".replace(/ /g, "+");
replace All
"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.".replaceAll(" ", "+");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
replace regex
replace All

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

**Overview**

The provided benchmark measures the performance of two approaches to replace whitespace characters with a special string in a given input string: `replace` (using a regular expression) and `replaceAll` (a method provided by some JavaScript libraries).

**Options Compared**

There are two options being compared:

1. **Regular Expressions (`/ /g, "+"`)**: This approach uses the `replace()` method with a regular expression to replace whitespace characters. The `/ /g` part specifies that all occurrences of whitespace should be replaced, and the `\+` is the replacement string.
2. **`replaceAll()` Method**: This approach uses a method called `replaceAll()`, which is not a standard JavaScript method. However, some libraries like jQuery provide this method for convenience.

**Pros and Cons**

1. **Regular Expressions**:
	* Pros: More flexible and powerful than simple `replace()` methods.
	* Cons: Can be slower due to the overhead of parsing regular expressions.
2. **`replaceAll()` Method**:
	* Pros: Can be faster since it's a specialized method designed for this specific use case.
	* Cons: Not supported by all JavaScript engines, and its implementation may vary across libraries.

**Library**

The `replaceAll()` method is likely provided by the jQuery library. However, MeasureThat.net does not explicitly mention that jQuery is required for this benchmark to run. If you're using a different library or implementation of this method, you might see different results.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in these benchmarks. They are focused on comparing the performance of two specific approaches to string replacement.

**Other Alternatives**

If you want to compare other string replacement methods, you could consider:

1. **Using `replace()` with a simple string**: Instead of using regular expressions, you could use the `replace()` method with a simple string, like `"_"`.
2. **Using a library like Lodash or Ramda for string manipulation**: These libraries provide various functions for string replacement and manipulation.
3. **Comparing performance with different JavaScript engines**: You could compare the performance of these methods on different JavaScript engines, such as V8 (Chrome), SpiderMonkey (Firefox), or V8-like engines.

In summary, MeasureThat.net provides a simple benchmark to compare the performance of two approaches to string replacement: regular expressions and the `replaceAll()` method. Understanding the pros and cons of each approach can help you make informed decisions about which method to use in your own projects.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 9 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 121 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
replace regex	347127.9 Ops/sec
replace All	316217.3 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

replaceAll vs regex replace pt2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: replace regex vs replace All

Created: 9 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

replace regex

replace All

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):