Benchmark: ES6 Class vs Prototype vs Object Literal vs Function vs Function with object destructuring

ES6 Class vs Prototype vs Object Literal vs Function vs Function with object destructuring (version: 2)

Test the speed and memory usage using 4 different techniques for constructing class objects (or rather calling functions).

Comparing performance of: ES6 Class vs Function Prototype vs Object Literal vs Basic function vs Basic functions with object destructuring

Created: 5 months ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Tests:

ES6 Class
class Point { constructor(x, y){ this.x = x; this.y = y; } add(point){ return new Point(this.x + point.x, this.y + point.y); } sub(point){ return new Point(this.x - point.x, this.y - point.y); } } var p1 = new Point(10, 10); var p2 = new Point(10, -10); var sum = p1.add(p2); var dif = p1.sub(p2);
Function Prototype
function Point(x, y){ this.x = x; this.y = y; } Point.prototype.add = function(point){ return new Point(this.x + point.x, this.y + point.y); } Point.prototype.sub = function(point){ return new Point(this.x - point.x, this.y - point.y); } var p1 = new Point(10, 10); var p2 = new Point(10, -10); var sum = p1.add(p2); var dif = p1.sub(p2);
Object Literal
function Point(x, y){ return { x, y, add: (point)=>Point(this.x + point.x, this.y + point.y), sub: (point)=>Point(this.x - point.x, this.y - point.y) } } var p1 = Point(10, 10); var p2 = Point(10, -10); var sum = p1.add(p2); var dif = p1.sub(p2);
Basic function
function Point(x, y){ return { x, y, }; } const add = (pointa, pointb) =>({ x: pointa.x + pointb.x, y: pointb.y + pointb.y }); const sub = (pointa, pointb) =>({ x: pointa.x - pointb.x, y: pointa.y - pointb.y }); var p1 = Point(10, 10); var p2 = Point(10, -10); var sum = add(p1, p2); var dif = sub(p1, p2);
Basic functions with object destructuring
function Point(x, y){ return { x, y, }; } const add = ({ x:xa, y:ya }, { x:xb, y:yb }) =>({ x: xa + xb, y: ya + yb }); const sub = ({ x:xa, y:ya }, { x:xb, y:yb }) =>({ x: xa - xb, y: ya - yb }); var p1 = Point(10, 10); var p2 = Point(10, -10); var sum = add(p1, p2); var dif = sub(p1, p2);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
ES6 Class
Function Prototype
Object Literal
Basic function
Basic functions with object destructuring

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/17.0 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 17 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
ES6 Class	3524369.0 Ops/sec
Function Prototype	4096838.0 Ops/sec
Object Literal	2365983.0 Ops/sec
Basic function	65396160.0 Ops/sec
Basic functions with object destructuring	63556240.0 Ops/sec

ES6 Class vs Prototype vs Object Literal vs Function vs Function with object destructuring (version: 2)

Test the speed and memory usage using 4 different techniques for constructing class objects (or rather calling functions).

Comparing performance of: ES6 Class vs Function Prototype vs Object Literal vs Basic function vs Basic functions with object destructuring

Created: 5 months ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

ES6 Class

Function Prototype

Object Literal

Basic function

Basic functions with object destructuring

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A