<div id="foo" class="s"></div>
var element = document.getElementById("foo");
var i = 1000;
while (i--) {
element.className += " bar";
}
var element = document.getElementById("foo");
var i = 1000;
while (i--) {
element.className = "bar";
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
1 | |
2 |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
1 | 2.7 Ops/sec |
2 | 26671.6 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help you understand what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark.
What is being tested?
The test cases are designed to measure the performance of different JavaScript microbenchmarks, specifically related to modifying the class name of an HTML element. The benchmarks compare two approaches:
element.className += " bar";
element.className = "bar";
Options being compared
The two options are compared in terms of their performance impact on different browsers and devices.
Pros and Cons of each approach
Library usage
There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, the document.getElementById
method is used to retrieve an HTML element by its ID, which is a built-in JavaScript API.
Special JS feature/syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in these benchmarks.
Other alternatives
Alternative approaches to modifying an element's class name could include:
To explore these alternatives, you can modify the benchmark definition or test cases to introduce new variables, functions, or libraries. For example:
"Script Preparation Code": "const styles = ['bar'];\nvar element = document.getElementById('foo');"
This modified script preparation code uses an array of style strings instead of a single class name, allowing for more complex styling scenarios to be tested.
Keep in mind that introducing new variables or libraries may affect the benchmark's accuracy and relevance. It's essential to ensure that any modifications align with the intended test goals and requirements.