const str = "application/json; charset=utf-8"
str.includes("application/json")
const str = "application/json; charset=utf-8"
str.startsWith("application/json")
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
includes | |
startsWith |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
includes | 1308550656.0 Ops/sec |
startsWith | 19261588.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Description:
The benchmark is testing two approaches for checking if a string starts with or includes another substring:
str.startsWith("application/json")
str.includes("application/json")
Options Compared:
The two options are being compared, which means we're evaluating their performance in this specific scenario.
Pros and Cons of Each Approach:
startsWith
:
Pros:
Cons:
includes
:
Pros:
Cons:
startsWith
for short strings that start with the specified substring, due to the need to scan the entire string.Library Used:
None of the provided benchmark definitions use a library explicitly. However, it's worth noting that startsWith
and includes
are built-in JavaScript methods.
Special JS Features/Syntax:
There aren't any special JS features or syntax used in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing two straightforward string comparison methods.
Other Alternatives:
If you wanted to test alternative approaches, here are a few options:
RegExp.test
or String.prototype.match
)Keep in mind that each of these alternatives would require significant changes to the benchmark definition and test setup.