Benchmark: 932lds - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

323234
const a = {}; for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { a[i] = i; } JSON.stringify(a);
3234234
const a = {}; for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { a[i] = i; } JSON.stringify(a);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
323234
3234234

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to help explain the benchmark and its various aspects.

**Benchmark Definition**

The provided JSON represents the benchmark definition, which is essentially the code that will be executed to test the JavaScript performance. In this case, there are two benchmarks:

1. "932lds" - This is the name of the benchmark.
2. The script preparation code is null, meaning that no custom initialization or setup is required for this benchmark.
3. There's also an optional HTML preparation code, but it's also null in this case.

**Individual Test Cases**

Each test case represents a separate instance of the same benchmark:

1. "323234" and "3234234" are the names of these individual test cases.

What's being tested?

The two test cases use the same script:
```javascript
const a = {};  for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { a[i] = i; } JSON.stringify(a);
```
This code creates an object `a` with `100,000` properties and then stringifies it using `JSON.stringify()`. The benchmark measures the time taken to execute this code.

**Options Compared**

The test case options being compared are:

1. **Execution speed**: This is the primary metric being measured. The execution speed will determine which browser or implementation performs better.
2. **Browser**: Different browsers may optimize their implementations differently, affecting performance.

Other considerations:

* **DevicePlatform**: Since there's only one device platform mentioned (Desktop), it's unclear if the benchmark is designed to accommodate mobile devices as well.
* **OperatingSystem**: Only Mac OS X 10.15.7 is listed as a valid operating system. This might limit the scope of the benchmark.

**Library and Libraries**

None are explicitly used in this benchmark, but `JSON.stringify()` is an ECMAScript standard, ensuring that all compliant browsers will be able to execute it correctly.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

There's no special JavaScript feature or syntax being used here; just a simple for loop, object creation, and stringification using the built-in `JSON.stringify()` function.

**Alternatives**

To test similar performance characteristics, you might consider:

1. **Other numerical benchmarks**: You could use other numerical code snippets to see which browser or implementation performs better.
2. **Memory usage tests**: Measure the memory usage of different browsers executing this or similar code.
3. **Web page loading times**: Test the time it takes for a web page to load with various browsers, possibly using a more complex HTML structure.

Keep in mind that each benchmark has its unique characteristics and may not be directly comparable to others.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 10 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 120 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
323234	67.2 Ops/sec
3234234	69.4 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

932lds (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: 323234 vs 3234234

Created: 10 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

323234

3234234

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):