<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
var und = undefined;
var bool = true;
var element;
element = !!und && typeof bool === 'boolean';
element = !_.isUndefined(und) && !_.isBoolean(bool);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Native | |
Lodash.js |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Native | 9671417.0 Ops/sec |
Lodash.js | 5136405.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares two approaches:
undefined
is equal to undefined
, and then checks if typeof bool
is 'boolean'
.isUndefined
and isBoolean
functions.The benchmark tests which approach executes faster on a specific browser (Chrome 120) running on a desktop platform (Windows).
Options compared
In this case, there are only two options being compared:
Pros and Cons of each approach:
undefined
and typeof
can vary.Library used
In this benchmark, Lodash is used. Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions for tasks such as array manipulation, object manipulation, and more. In this case, it's specifically being used to check if undefined
is equal to undefined
and if bool
is a boolean value.
Special JS feature or syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark that require any additional explanation.
Other alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are some options:
?.
) or nullish coalescing (??
)Keep in mind that each alternative will have its own pros and cons, depending on the specific requirements of your project.
I hope this explanation helps!