Benchmark: Testing shift vs splice perf

Tests:

splice
const things = new Array(1000000) const a = things.slice(1)
shift
const things = new Array(1000000) const b = things.shift(1)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
splice
shift

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Overview of the Benchmark**

The provided JSON represents two test cases for measuring the performance difference between using `Array.shift()` and `Array.splice()`. These methods are used to remove elements from an array.

**What is being tested?**

Two individual test cases are compared:

1. **`splice`**: This test case uses `Array.prototype.splice()` to create a copy of the original array (`things`) and then removes the first element from the copied array.
2. **`shift`**: This test case uses `Array.prototype.shift()` to remove the first element directly from the original array (`things`).

**Options compared**

The two methods being tested are:

* `splice()`: This method creates a new array with the elements shifted down by one position, and removes the specified element(s) from the end of the array. It returns an array of removed elements.
* `shift()`: This method removes the first element from the array and returns it.

**Pros and Cons**

### Splice()

Pros:

* Allows for more flexibility in removing elements from the array (e.g., removing multiple elements, replacing elements).
* Can be used to create a new array with modified elements.

Cons:

* Creates a new array, which can be memory-intensive.
* Returns an array of removed elements, which can add overhead.

### Shift()

Pros:

* More efficient than `splice()` since it only removes the first element without creating a new array.
* Returns the removed element directly.

Cons:

* Can only remove one element at a time from the beginning of the array.
* Does not return any modified arrays.

**Library usage**

There is no library being used in these test cases. The `Array.prototype` methods are being tested natively.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

None mentioned, but it's worth noting that some browsers may have specific optimizations for these methods (e.g., Chrome has a optimized implementation of `shift()` and `splice()`).

**Other alternatives**

If you wanted to test other array manipulation methods, you could consider using:

* `Array.prototype.slice()`: Similar to `splice()`, but creates a shallow copy of the array.
* `Array.prototype.unshift()`: Adds elements to the beginning of the array.
* `Array.prototype.pop()`: Removes and returns the last element from the end of the array.

However, it's worth noting that these alternatives may not provide the same level of performance as the native methods being tested.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/120.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Chrome 120 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
splice	148.4 Ops/sec
shift	291.4 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Testing shift vs splice perf (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: splice vs shift

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

splice

shift

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):