Benchmark: Lodash vs Ramda - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/ramda@0/ramda.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

  var data = [..._.range(1000).map(function(i) {
    return {
      counter: i
    }
  }),..._.range(1000).map(function(i) {
    return {
      counter: i
    }
  })];

Tests:

Lodash
var result = _.uniq(data);
Ramda without relying on currying or composition
var result = R.uniq(data);
roll
function* unique(xs) { const seen = new Set(); for (const x of xs) { if (seen.has(x)) continue; seen.add(x); yield x; } } var result = [...unique(data)];

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash
Ramda without relying on currying or composition
roll

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/15.6 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 15 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash	21832.0 Ops/sec
Ramda without relying on currying or composition	72.3 Ops/sec
roll	6920.8 Ops/sec

Lodash vs Ramda (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash vs Ramda without relying on currying or composition vs roll

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lodash

Ramda without relying on currying or composition

roll

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A