window.myString = "Hello, world!";
window.prefix = "Hello";
window.regex = /^Hello/;
if (myString.startsWith(prefix)) {
// do something
}
if (regex.test(myString)) {
// do something
}
if (myString.indexOf(prefix) === 0) {
// do something
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
startsWith | |
regex | |
indexOf |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
startsWith | 790289.5 Ops/sec |
regex | 582831.0 Ops/sec |
indexOf | 714502.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark.
The test compares three different approaches to check if a string starts with a certain prefix:
startsWith
method: This is a built-in JavaScript method that checks if a string starts with another string.regex
) pattern: This uses a regular expression to match the prefix at the start of the string.indexOf
method: This method returns the index of the first occurrence of a substring in a string.What are the pros and cons of each approach?
startsWith
method:indexOf
if you need to match multiple prefixes or use wildcards.regex
) pattern:startsWith
due to the overhead of parsing and executing regex patterns. May also require additional setup if you're not familiar with regex syntax.indexOf
method:startsWith
due to the need to search through the entire string for the prefix.Other considerations
^
symbol at the start of the pattern is used to indicate a match from the start of the string.Library and syntax
None mentioned in the provided JSON, but we can infer that JavaScript's built-in methods (startsWith
, indexOf
) are being tested.
There are no special JS features or syntax being tested in this benchmark.
Alternatives
Other approaches for checking if a string starts with a certain prefix include:
regex.test(myString) && regex.test(prefix)
.However, these alternatives are less common and more verbose than using built-in JavaScript methods (startsWith
, indexOf
).