Benchmark: startsWith or regex test or indexOf

Script Preparation code:

window.myString = "Hello, world!";
window.prefix = "Hello";
window.regex = /^Hello/;

Tests:

startsWith
if (myString.startsWith(prefix)) { // do something }
regex
if (regex.test(myString)) { // do something }
indexOf
if (myString.indexOf(prefix) === 0) { // do something }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
startsWith
regex
indexOf

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 27 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark.

The test compares three different approaches to check if a string starts with a certain prefix:

1. `startsWith` method: This is a built-in JavaScript method that checks if a string starts with another string.
2. Regex (`regex`) pattern: This uses a regular expression to match the prefix at the start of the string.
3. `indexOf` method: This method returns the index of the first occurrence of a substring in a string.

**What are the pros and cons of each approach?**

1. `startsWith` method:
	* Pros: Simple, fast, and widely supported across browsers and platforms.
	* Cons: May be less flexible than regex or `indexOf` if you need to match multiple prefixes or use wildcards.
2. Regex (`regex`) pattern:
	* Pros: Highly flexible, allowing for complex matching patterns, and can be used for both prefix and suffix matching.
	* Cons: Slower than `startsWith` due to the overhead of parsing and executing regex patterns. May also require additional setup if you're not familiar with regex syntax.
3. `indexOf` method:
	* Pros: Can handle multi-character prefixes and allows for starting index offsets, making it useful for finding substrings in specific positions within a string.
	* Cons: Slower than `startsWith` due to the need to search through the entire string for the prefix.

**Other considerations**

* In terms of performance, the order of execution might matter. However, since the benchmark is focused on the string comparison itself rather than the overall code execution time, this aspect is less relevant.
* For regex, consider that the `^` symbol at the start of the pattern is used to indicate a match from the start of the string.

**Library and syntax**

None mentioned in the provided JSON, but we can infer that JavaScript's built-in methods (`startsWith`, `indexOf`) are being tested.

There are no special JS features or syntax being tested in this benchmark.

**Alternatives**

Other approaches for checking if a string starts with a certain prefix include:

1. Using a custom function: You could create a simple function that checks each character of the input string against the prefix, returning true as soon as it finds a match.
2. Regular expression alternatives: Other regex patterns might be used to achieve the same result, such as `regex.test(myString) && regex.test(prefix)`.

However, these alternatives are less common and more verbose than using built-in JavaScript methods (`startsWith`, `indexOf`).

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 11 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/102.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 102 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
startsWith	790289.5 Ops/sec
regex	582831.0 Ops/sec
indexOf	714502.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

startsWith or regex test or indexOf (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: startsWith vs regex vs indexOf

Created: 11 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

startsWith

regex

indexOf

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 27 days ago):