const array = [];
for (let i=0; i<10000000; i++) {
array[i] = 1;
}
const array = new Array(10000000);
for (let i=0; i<10000000; i++) {
array[i] = i;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
dynamic | |
Preallocation |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
dynamic | 34.6 Ops/sec |
Preallocation | 14.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is defined by the Script Preparation Code
field, which is currently empty. This means that the test script itself will be generated dynamically for each execution.
However, we can look at the individual test cases to understand what's being compared:
new Array(10000000)
, then loops through it to assign values.Options being compared
The benchmark is comparing two approaches:
Pros and Cons
Dynamic Allocation (Test Case: "dynamic")
Pros:
Cons:
Preallocation (Test Case: "Preallocation")
Pros:
Cons:
Other Considerations
Both approaches have their trade-offs. Dynamic allocation is more flexible but may incur performance overhead, while preallocation provides faster execution times but can result in wasted memory.
Library/Feature Description (None)
There are no libraries or special JavaScript features being used in these benchmark tests.
Alternative Approaches
Other alternatives to consider:
Array.prototype.map()
: This method can be used instead of dynamic allocation for creating arrays. It's often faster and more concise, but may not provide the same level of control as preallocation.Buffer
or TypedArray
: For large datasets, using Buffer
or TypedArray
objects can provide better performance and memory efficiency compared to traditional JavaScript arrays.Keep in mind that these alternative approaches would require modifications to the benchmark script to accommodate them.