var data = { Array.from(Array(10000).keys()) };
Object.entries(data).reduce((acc, [k, v]) => {
acc[k] = v.toString();
return acc;
}, {});
Object.entries(data).reduce((acc, [k, v]) => ({
acc,
[k]: v.toString()
}), {});
Object.entries(data).reduce((acc, [k, v]) => {
acc.set(k,v)
return acc;
}, new Map());
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Reusing object | |
Creating new object | |
Using map |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Reusing object | 583.8 Ops/sec |
Creating new object | 0.2 Ops/sec |
Using map | 671.5 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
What is being tested?
MeasureThat.net is testing three different approaches to iterating over an array and reducing an object in JavaScript:
reduce
method on the original object, modifying its properties directly.reduce
method.Map
data structure to iterate over the array and accumulate values.Options compared
The benchmark is comparing these three approaches in terms of execution time, with the goal of determining which one is the fastest.
Pros and cons of each approach:
Map
object.Library used
In the benchmark code, no libraries are explicitly mentioned, but the use of Array.from()
suggests that the test is using the built-in Array
and String
functions from JavaScript.
Special JS feature/syntax
The benchmark does not appear to use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what is required for the comparisons. However, it's worth noting that the use of reduce
and Map
implies some familiarity with functional programming concepts in JavaScript.
Other alternatives
In addition to these three approaches, other possible ways to iterate over an array and reduce an object might include:
for...of
loop or a traditional for
loopIt's worth noting that the choice of approach often depends on the specific use case and requirements of the project. For example, reusing the original object might be suitable if you need to maintain state between iterations, while creating a new object might be more suitable if you want to isolate properties.
Overall, MeasureThat.net provides a useful benchmarking tool for comparing different approaches to JavaScript microbenchmarks, allowing developers to evaluate and optimize their code in a fair and controlled environment.