Benchmark: Test osusara - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var test = true

Tests:

Ternary
test ? "true" : "false"
String interpolation
`${test}`
toString()
test.toString()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Ternary
String interpolation
toString()

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the provided JSON benchmark definitions and explain what's being tested, compared, and other considerations.

**Benchmark Definition json**

The `Name` field represents the name of the benchmark, which is "Test osusara".

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code is a simple JavaScript statement that assigns a boolean value to a variable named `test`. The `? :` operator is called the ternary operator or conditional operator. It evaluates an expression on both sides and returns one value if the first is true, or another value if the first is false.

**Html Preparation Code**

There's no HTML preparation code provided, so we won't discuss it here.

**Individual Test Cases**

There are three test cases:

1. **Ternary**: The benchmark definition uses the ternary operator to evaluate an expression. In this case, the variable `test` is assigned a boolean value. The benchmark tests how fast JavaScript can execute a simple conditional statement.
2. **String interpolation**: This benchmark definition uses template literals (the `${}` syntax) to concatenate strings with a dynamic value. It tests the performance of string interpolation in JavaScript.
3. **toString()**: This benchmark definition calls the `toString()` method on a variable named `test`. It tests the performance of calling this built-in method.

**Other Considerations**

* The benchmarks are designed to test specific aspects of JavaScript's behavior, such as conditional statements, string manipulation, and method invocation.
* By comparing different approaches, the benchmarks can help determine which one is most efficient or optimal for a particular use case.
* The benchmark results will show which approach performs better in terms of execution speed.

**Library Use**

There are no libraries explicitly mentioned in the provided JSON. However, if you were to write additional test cases using external libraries, it would depend on the specific library being used. For example, if you were testing a specific DOM manipulation library, that library's API would be used instead of native JavaScript methods.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

The `? :` operator (ternary operator) and template literals (`${}` syntax) are both special features in JavaScript. They allow for concise and expressive coding, but their performance impact is what the benchmark is testing.

In summary, these benchmarks test the performance of specific aspects of JavaScript, such as conditional statements, string manipulation, and method invocation. By comparing different approaches, they aim to determine which one is most efficient or optimal for a particular use case.

**Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternatives or similar benchmarks, you might consider:

* jsbench.net: A platform that allows users to create and run JavaScript benchmarks.
* Mathjs.org: A library that provides mathematical functions, including some related to string manipulation and conditional statements.
* Babel.js: A transpiler that can be used to test the performance of different JavaScript versions or syntax features.

Keep in mind that these alternatives might not provide the exact same benchmarking experience as MeasureThat.net, but they can still help you explore specific aspects of JavaScript's behavior.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/119.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 119 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Ternary	32262946.0 Ops/sec
String interpolation	32038780.0 Ops/sec
toString()	30706952.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Test osusara (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Ternary vs String interpolation vs toString()

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Ternary

String interpolation

toString()

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):