var bool = true
bool ? "true" : "false"
`${bool}`
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Turnary | |
String interpolation |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Turnary | 20407656.0 Ops/sec |
String interpolation | 19699716.0 Ops/sec |
Benchmark Overview
The provided benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches for converting a Boolean value to a string: using a ternary operator (bool ? "true" : "false"
), and using string interpolation (${bool}
).
Approach Comparison
Two approaches are being compared:
${booleanValue}
syntax to convert the Boolean value to a string.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Library/Feature Description
In this benchmark, both approaches rely on template literals, which is a JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). Template literals allow for a more readable and flexible way of concatenating strings with expressions.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
This benchmark uses template literals (${booleanValue}
), which is a special syntax in JavaScript. It's a relatively modern feature, so it may not work in older browsers or environments that don't support ES6+.
Other Alternatives
If you want to write a similar benchmark for other approaches, consider the following alternatives:
+
: Instead of using ternary operators or template literals, you can use string concatenation with the +
operator ("true" + (bool ? "" : "false")
)Boolean(bool) ? "true" : "false"
)Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics compared to the original approaches, and you should consider factors like code readability, maintainability, and browser support when choosing an approach for your benchmark.