Benchmark: JQuery Speed Test

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='//code.jquery.com/jquery-1.12.4.min.js'></script>
<script>
  var $jq1124 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.4/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script>
  var $jq224 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq331 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<div>
  <ul id="menu">
    <li class="menu-item">
    </li>
    <li class="menu-item">
    </li>
    <li class="menu-item">
    </li>
    <li class="menu-item">
    </li>
    
  </ul>
</div>

AخA
 
<script src='//code.jquery.com/jquery-1.12.4.min.js'></script>
<script>
  var $jq1124 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.4/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script>
  var $jq224 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq331 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<div>
  <ul id="menu">
    <li class="menu-item">
    </li>
    <li class="menu-item">
    </li>
    <li class="menu-item">
    </li>
    <li class="menu-item">
    </li>
    
  </ul>
</div>

Script Preparation code:

function tests($) {
    $('#menu').css({
      'backgroud': 'red'
    });
    $('.menu-item').eq(2).hasClass('foo');
}

​x
 
function tests($) {    $('#menu').css({      'backgroud': 'red'    });    $('.menu-item').eq(2).hasClass('foo');}​

Tests:

$jq1124
tests($jq1124);
tests($jq1124);
$jq224
tests($jq224);
tests($jq224);
$jq331
tests($jq331);
tests($jq331);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Experimental features:

Memory measurements supported only in Chrome.
For precise memory measurements Chrome must be launched with --enable-precise-memory-info flag.
More information: Monitoring JavaScript Memory

Test case name	Result
$jq1124
$jq224
$jq331

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 136 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
$jq1124	902214.8 Ops/sec
$jq224	1008979.8 Ops/sec
$jq331	898485.2 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gemma2:9b, generated 7 months ago):

This benchmark tests the performance of three different versions of the jQuery library:

$jq1124: jQuery version 1.12.4
$jq224: jQuery version 2.2.4
$jq331: jQuery version 3.3.1

The benchmark measures how quickly each version can execute the following JavaScript code:

Sets the background color of an element with id "menu" to red.
Checks if a specific list item within the menu (the third one) has a class named "foo".

Options Compared:

The options compared are different jQuery versions, highlighting how performance can vary across releases.

Pros/Cons and Considerations:

jQuery 1.12.4 ($jq1124): This is an older version. While it may be reliable and have good support for legacy projects, newer versions often offer performance improvements and bug fixes.
jQuery 2.2.4 ($jq224): A more recent release than 1.12.4, likely to have some performance enhancements over the older version. However, it might not be as optimized as the latest version.
jQuery 3.3.1 ($jq331): The most recent version tested, potentially offering the best performance due to ongoing optimization efforts by the jQuery team.

Library:

jQuery: A popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation, event handling, animation, and AJAX interactions.

Alternatives:

There are several alternatives to jQuery for accomplishing similar tasks:

Vanilla JavaScript: Using native JavaScript APIs directly can sometimes be faster than using a library like jQuery, especially for simple tasks. However, it often requires more code.
Other Libraries/Frameworks:
- React, Angular, Vue.js are popular modern frameworks that handle DOM manipulation and event handling differently from jQuery.

Let me know if you'd like to delve deeper into any specific aspect of this benchmark!

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

This benchmark tests the performance of three different versions of the jQuery library:

* **$jq1124**:  jQuery version 1.12.4
* **$jq224**: jQuery version 2.2.4
* **$jq331**: jQuery version 3.3.1

The benchmark measures how quickly each version can execute the following JavaScript code:

* Sets the background color of an element with id "menu" to red.
* Checks if a specific list item within the menu (the third one) has a class named "foo".

**Options Compared:**

The options compared are different jQuery versions, highlighting how performance can vary across releases.

**Pros/Cons and Considerations:**

* **jQuery 1.12.4 ($jq1124):** This is an older version. While it may be reliable and have good support for legacy projects, newer versions often offer performance improvements and bug fixes.
* **jQuery 2.2.4 ($jq224):** A more recent release than 1.12.4, likely to have some performance enhancements over the older version. However, it might not be as optimized as the latest version.
* **jQuery 3.3.1 ($jq331):**  The most recent version tested, potentially offering the best performance due to ongoing optimization efforts by the jQuery team.

**Library:**

* **jQuery**: A popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation, event handling, animation, and AJAX interactions.

**Alternatives:**

There are several alternatives to jQuery for accomplishing similar tasks:

* **Vanilla JavaScript:** Using native JavaScript APIs directly can sometimes be faster than using a library like jQuery, especially for simple tasks. However, it often requires more code.
* **Other Libraries/Frameworks:** 
    * React, Angular, Vue.js are popular modern frameworks that handle DOM manipulation and event handling differently from jQuery.

Let me know if you'd like to delve deeper into any specific aspect of this benchmark!

Related benchmarks:

JQuery Speed Test (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: $jq1124 vs $jq224 vs $jq331

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

$jq1124

$jq224

$jq331

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gemma2:9b, generated 7 months ago):