var stringToMatch = 'hello';
[ 'hello'].includes(stringToMatch)
stringToMatch === 'hello'
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.includes | |
Or chain |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.includes | 78011960.0 Ops/sec |
Or chain | 727692800.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.
Benchmark Definition Explanation
The benchmark is designed to measure the performance difference between two approaches:
Array.includes()
to check if an element exists in an array.===
) to compare a value with a string literal.In essence, this benchmark tests how much slower or faster each approach is compared to the other.
Options Compared
The two options being compared are:
includes()
method on an array to check if a specific element exists within it.===
): This method uses a simple equality comparison between two values, in this case, comparing a string variable with a string literal.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
===
):Library Used
None. This benchmark doesn't use any external libraries.
Special JS Features/Syntax (Optional)
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark.
Other Considerations
Array.includes()
might be more suitable for searching large datasets or arrays, while a strict equality check (===
) might be sufficient for simple value comparisons.Alternative Approaches
In addition to the two options being compared (Or chain and Strict equality check), other approaches could include:
Array.includes()
, you could use string interpolation to concatenate strings with the matched element. This approach would likely incur more overhead due to the creation of a new string object.Array.includes()
but more complex and less readable.These alternative approaches are not directly related to the original benchmark definition and would require additional setup and testing.