const str = `hey can i be in `;
const shortx = `hey can i`
const noop = Function.prototype;
`hey can i be in `.startsWith(`hey can`)
`hey can i be in `.slice(7) === `hey can`
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
startswith | |
slice |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
startswith | 35466584.0 Ops/sec |
slice | 984225152.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and explain what's being tested.
Overview
The MeasureThat.net benchmark is comparing two approaches to check if a string starts with a specific substring: startsWith
and slicing using the slice()
method.
Options being compared
startsWith
: This method returns a boolean value indicating whether the string starts with the specified substring.slice()
: This method returns a new string that is a slice of the original string, starting from index 7 (since we're comparing "hey can i" with "hey can") and returning the next character.Pros and Cons
startsWith
:slice()
:Library
There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, Function.prototype
is used in the script preparation code, which suggests that the benchmark might be testing modern JavaScript features or browser-specific behavior.
Special JS feature/syntax
The benchmark definition uses template literals (\r\n
) and a custom function (Function.prototype
) to prepare the input strings. These are likely related to modern JavaScript features, but their exact purpose is not crucial for understanding the comparison between startsWith
and slicing using slice()
.
Other alternatives
If you were to implement this benchmark, other approaches might include:
regex.test()
)Keep in mind that the goal of this benchmark is to compare two specific approaches, and exploring alternative methods would likely alter the focus of the comparison.
In summary, MeasureThat.net's "startswith vs slice" benchmark compares two common ways to check if a string starts with a substring: startsWith
(a built-in method) and slicing using slice()
(an array-like approach). While both approaches have their pros and cons, the choice between them depends on performance, readability, and personal preference.