<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
<div id='test'></div>
var el = document.getElementById("test");
var el = $("#test");
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Vanilla JS | |
JQuery 3.3.1 |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Vanilla JS | 1672447.9 Ops/sec |
JQuery 3.3.1 | 862906.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its components.
Benchmark Purpose: The purpose of this benchmark is to compare the performance of two JavaScript approaches: Vanilla JS (native JavaScript) and jQuery 3.3.1 (a popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation).
Script Preparation Code vs. HTML Preparation Code:
In the provided JSON, there are two types of preparation codes:
null
), which means that no additional script is loaded before running the benchmark.test
. The purpose of this code is to create a test environment for the benchmark.Options Compared:
The two options being compared are:
document.getElementById()
, to find an element by its ID.$
function, which is a shorthand for jQuery(selector)
, to find an element by its ID.Pros and Cons of Each Approach:
document.getElementById()
, which can lead to more complex code.$
function.Library:
The jQuery library (3.3.1) is a popular JavaScript library that provides a set of functions for manipulating the Document Object Model (DOM). Its primary purpose is to simplify DOM interactions, making it easier to write concise and efficient code. In this benchmark, jQuery is used to load its $
function, which allows users to find elements by their ID using $(selector)
.
Special JS Feature or Syntax: There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the provided JSON that would require additional explanation. The focus of the benchmark is on comparing two existing approaches: Vanilla JS and jQuery 3.3.1.
Alternative Approaches:
Other alternatives for finding an element by its ID could include:
document.querySelector()
(a more modern, flexible alternative to document.getElementById()
)Keep in mind that each approach has its pros and cons, and the choice of method depends on the specific requirements and constraints of your application.