var a = "42";
const b = parseInt(a);
const c = Number(a);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
parseInt | |
Number |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
parseInt | 4754629.5 Ops/sec |
Number | 4821781.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark measures the performance difference between using parseInt()
and Number()
functions to parse a string to an integer. The input string is set to "42"
.
Options Compared
Two options are being compared:
parseInt()
: This function takes two arguments: the string to be parsed, and an optional radix (base) for the parsing. Since no radix is specified in this benchmark, it defaults to base 10.Number()
: This built-in JavaScript function attempts to convert a string to a number using various methods, including coercion to a decimal value.Pros and Cons
parseInt()
:Number()
:parseInt()
for strings that can be converted to integers.Library and Purpose
None are explicitly mentioned in the provided JSON.
Special JS Features or Syntax
Neither parseInt()
nor Number()
utilize any special JavaScript features or syntax. They are both standard built-in functions that have been part of the language since its inception.
Other Alternatives
If you need to parse strings to integers, other alternatives might include:
toString()
and parseFloat()
: This combination would involve calling toString()
on the number before passing it to parseFloat()
, which can provide more control over the parsing process.parseInt()
.In summary, the benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two common methods for parsing strings to integers in JavaScript: parseInt()
and Number()
. The choice between these options depends on your specific use case and requirements.