var array = new Array(100).map((a, i) => i)
var set = new Set(array)
array = array.slice(1, 0)
set.delete(1)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
set |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 26555700.0 Ops/sec |
set | 51980668.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of Array.prototype.slice()
and Set
data structures in JavaScript. The test creates an array with 100 elements, maps each element to its index, and then passes this array to both slice()
and set()
methods.
Options Compared
There are two main options being compared:
Pros and Cons
Set
for small to medium-sized arrays due to its overhead in creating a new array.slice()
for large datasets, as it needs to iterate over all elements.Library/Utility
In this test case, there is no specific library or utility being used beyond the built-in JavaScript Array
and Set
types. However, if we consider the map()
method used in the script preparation code, it's worth noting that map()
is a part of the ECMAScript specification and has been supported by most modern browsers for many years.
Special JS Features/Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is solely on comparing the performance of two built-in data structures (Array.prototype.slice()
and Set
).
Other Alternatives
If you were to design a similar benchmark, you might also consider testing:
Set
for storing unique values.Keep in mind that the specific alternatives will depend on your goals and requirements for testing JavaScript performance.