Benchmark: String() vs .toString()rewfsdgdsg

Tests:

String()
let num = 500; let nums = []; for(let i = 0; i < 100; ++i) { nums.push(String(num)); }
.toString()
let num = 500; let nums = []; for(let i = 0; i < 100; ++i) { nums.push(num.toString()); }
sds
let num = 500; let nums = []; for(let i = 0; i < 100; ++i) { nums.push(num + ''); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
String()
.toString()
sds

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring the performance of different JavaScript operations is crucial for understanding the underlying mechanisms and optimizing code for better performance.

The provided JSON represents a benchmark test created on MeasurThat.net, which compares the execution times of three different approaches:

1. **String()**: This approach creates a new string object using the `String()` function.
2. **.toString()**: This approach calls the `toString()` method on an existing number value.

**Pros and Cons:**

*   **String()**:
    *   Pros:
        *   Creates a new string object, which can be useful if you need to modify or manipulate the created string.
        *   Can be safer in certain scenarios, as it avoids calling a method on a potentially mutable variable.
    *   Cons:
        *   Creates an additional object, which can lead to increased memory usage and overhead.
*   **.toString()**:
    *   Pros:
        *   Avoids creating an additional object and uses the existing number value's string representation directly.
        *   Can be more efficient in terms of memory usage and computation.

The choice between these approaches depends on your specific use case, requirements, and performance considerations.

**Library Usage:**

None of the test cases explicitly use any libraries, but some might depend on the JavaScript engine or environment used to run the tests. The benchmark results provided are likely specific to the Chrome browser running on a Mac OS X 10.15.7 system.

**Special JS Features/Syntax:**

There's no special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in this benchmark that requires any particular explanation.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/116.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 116 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
String()	138437.2 Ops/sec
.toString()	1631596.4 Ops/sec
sds	5192293.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

String() vs .toString()rewfsdgdsg (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: String() vs .toString() vs sds

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

String()

.toString()

sds

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):