var crop = eval('[1,2,3,4];');
var crop = JSON.parse('[1,2,3,4]');
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
eval | |
parse |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
eval | 6011780.0 Ops/sec |
parse | 5017069.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares two approaches: eval
and JSON.parse
. The script preparation code for each test case is:
eval
: var crop = eval('[1,2,3,4];');
JSON.parse
: var crop = JSON.parse('[1,2,3,4]');
What's being tested
In this benchmark, we're testing the performance difference between using the eval
function and parsing a JSON string with JSON.parse
. The key aspect being measured is how fast each approach can execute.
Options compared
There are two options being compared:
eval
: Evaluates a given JavaScript code snippet as if it were executed in the current scope.JSON.parse
: Parses a JSON string into a JavaScript object.Pros and Cons of each approach:
eval
:JSON.parse
:eval
, as it only parses the JSON string into an object without executing any code.Library and purpose
In this benchmark, there is no explicit library being used. However, JSON.parse
relies on the built-in JavaScript JSON
object, which is part of the ECMAScript standard.
Special JS features or syntax
There are no special JS features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark. The code snippets are simple and straightforward.
Other alternatives
If you wanted to explore alternative approaches, some options could be:
jsonparser
or json-stringify-safe
that provide faster parsing capabilities compared to JSON.parse
.Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on your specific use case and requirements. For this benchmark, using JSON.parse
is likely a good option for its speed benefits, while eval
might be better suited for situations requiring dynamic code execution.