Benchmark: fghjkt 6 and at max 200 characters long.

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://unpkg.com/vue@3"></script>

Tests:

Reactive
const {reactive, ref, computed} = Vue; const v = reactive({ foo: "bar" }); const bar = v.foo; const frog = computed(()=>{ return v.foo + "!"; }); v.foo = "foo"
Ref
const {reactive, ref, computed} = Vue; const v = ref({ foo: "bar" }); const bar = v.value.foo; const frog = computed(()=>{ return v.value.foo + "!"; }); v.value.foo = "foo"

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Reactive
Ref

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/117.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 117 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Reactive	218247.3 Ops/sec
Ref	141183.6 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Benchmark Explanation**

MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark tests the performance of two different approaches in Vue.js: reactive and ref.

**Approaches Compared**

The test cases compare the performance of `reactive` and `ref` functions from Vue.js. Both approaches are used to declare reactive state, but they differ in how the state is updated and accessed.

**Reactive Approach**

In the reactive approach, a new object is created using `reactive`, which makes the property values observable. The `computed` function is used to create a computed property that depends on the reactive state. In this case, the `frog` variable is computed as `v.foo + "!\"`. When the `foo` property of the reactive state changes, the `frog` variable will be updated.

Pros:

* Easy to use and understand
* Automatic dependency tracking

Cons:

* Can lead to performance issues if the number of dependencies is high
* Can be slower due to the creation of a new object for each change

**Ref Approach**

In the ref approach, a single reference value is created using `ref`, which makes the property values observable. The `value` property of the ref is used to access the underlying value, and changes to this value will trigger updates to dependent properties.

Pros:

* Can be faster than reactive approach due to reduced object creation
* More fine-grained control over dependency tracking

Cons:

* Requires more manual management of dependencies
* Can lead to performance issues if not managed correctly

**Library: Vue.js**

Vue.js is a progressive and flexible JavaScript framework for building web applications. The `reactive` and `ref` functions are part of the core library, providing a way to manage reactive state and references.

The `computed` function is also part of the core library, allowing developers to create computed properties that depend on reactive state or ref values.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark. It only uses standard JavaScript syntax and Vue.js API.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for managing reactive state and references include:

* React: Provides a similar concept of state management using `useState` and `useRef`.
* MobX: A reactive state management library that provides similar functionality to Vue's reactive approach.
* Redux: A state management library that uses a store to manage global state, but can be used with ref-like approaches for local state management.

In summary, the benchmark tests the performance of two different approaches in Vue.js: reactive and ref. The reactive approach is easier to use but may lead to performance issues if the number of dependencies is high, while the ref approach provides more fine-grained control over dependency tracking but requires more manual management.

Related benchmarks:

fghjkt 6 and at max 200 characters long. (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Reactive vs Ref

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Reactive

Ref

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):