Benchmark: JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance reassign same variable 2

Tests:

Using the spread operator
let firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const v = {...firstObject, ...secondObject}
Using Object.assign
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const v = Object.assign({}, firstObject, secondObject);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Using the spread operator
Using Object.assign

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Sumamry (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what's being tested in this benchmark.

**Benchmark Definition:**

The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two different ways of combining objects in JavaScript:

1. Using the spread operator (`...`).
2. Using `Object.assign()` with an initial empty object as the target (`Object.assign({}, ...)`).

**Options compared:**

We have two options being compared:

* Option A: Using the spread operator (`...`) to combine two objects into a new object.
	+ **Pros:** More concise and readable syntax, works well for simple cases where both objects are small.
	+ **Cons:** May create intermediate objects in memory, which can be expensive if dealing with very large objects or datasets.
* Option B: Using `Object.assign()` to combine two objects into a new object.
	+ **Pros:** Avoids creating intermediate objects in memory, can be more efficient for large datasets.
	+ **Cons:** More verbose syntax, may not be as readable.

**Library and special JS feature used:**

None of the options mentioned above require any external libraries or use special JavaScript features. The spread operator is a built-in language feature introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES2018), while `Object.assign()` has been part of the language since ES5.

**Test case context:**

The test case seems to be focused on comparing the performance of these two options when combining objects with similar structure and size. The use of an empty object as the initial target for `Object.assign()` ensures that we're only dealing with simple data, which makes it a good candidate for benchmarking.

**Other alternatives:**

Some other ways to combine objects in JavaScript include:

* Using array methods like `concat()` or `reduce()`
* Creating a new object using an object literal and then assigning values from the source objects
* Using libraries like Lodash's `merge()` function

However, these alternatives might introduce additional complexity and are not being tested here.

I hope this explanation helps software engineers understand what's being tested in this benchmark!

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/115.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 115 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Using the spread operator	6429735.0 Ops/sec
Using Object.assign	11668630.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance reassign same variable 2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Using the spread operator vs Using Object.assign

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Using the spread operator

Using Object.assign

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Sumamry (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 days ago):