var array = [1,2,3];
var d = array[1];
var z = array.at(1);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
array[1] | |
array.at(1) |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
array[1] | 17697324.0 Ops/sec |
array.at(1) | 17799052.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The test compares two ways to access the second element of an array: using the bracket notation (array[1]
) and using the at()
method.
Options Compared
There are two options being compared:
array[1]
accesses the second element of the array
.at()
Method: Introduced in ECMAScript 2019 (ES9), the at()
method provides a more efficient and expressive way to access array elements by providing an optional offset value.Pros and Cons
Array Bracket Notation
Pros:
Cons:
Array at()
Method
Pros:
Cons:
Library Usage
The test case uses the array
variable, which is assumed to be an array object. This suggests that the benchmark is testing the performance of accessing array elements using different methods.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There are no special features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is solely on comparing two approaches to access array elements.
Alternatives
If you wanted to test other ways to access array elements, some alternatives could include:
array[0]
and accessing the first element directly.Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be as straightforward or efficient as using the at()
method.
Benchmark Preparation Code
The preparation code is provided:
var array = [1, 2, 3];
This creates an example array with three elements.
Individual Test Cases
The test cases are defined in two separate benchmark definitions:
array[1]
: Tests accessing the second element of the array
using traditional bracket notation.array.at(1)
: Tests accessing the second element of the array
using the at()
method.These test cases provide a way to measure the performance difference between these two approaches.