<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/lodash/4.16.0/lodash.min.js"></script>
var person = {name: 'Frederick', lastName: 'Corcino Alejo'};
_.get(person, 'name');
person.name
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Lodash get | |
Native |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Lodash get | 25835662.0 Ops/sec |
Native | 102820688.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON benchmark definition and test cases to understand what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition:
The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches:
_.get(person, 'name');
using Lodashperson.name
These two approaches are used to access a property ("name"
in this case) of an object (person
).
Options Compared:
The options being compared are:
_.get()
method with two arguments (the object and the path to the desired property)person.name
)Pros and Cons of Each Approach:
_.get()
method:person.name
):_.get()
, as it only involves a simple property access.Other Considerations:
Library:
In this benchmark, Lodash is used as a utility library for accessing nested properties with the _.get()
method. This allows for more flexibility and reduces the risk of typos, making it easier to write maintainable code.
No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in these test cases.
Alternatives:
If you prefer not to use Lodash, other alternatives for accessing nested properties include:
lodash-es
(ES version) which is optimized for ES module systemsuseCallback
and useMemo
Keep in mind that the best approach will depend on your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preferences.