const a = [Array(50000)].map(()=>self.crypto.randomUUID())
a.include("a")
console.log()
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
include | |
dummy |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
include | 0.0 Ops/sec |
dummy | 6842680.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of the MeasureThat.net benchmark.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark, where users can create and run tests to measure the performance of different code snippets. In this specific example, we have two test cases:
array include
: This test case creates an array with 50,000 random UUIDs using the self.crypto.randomUUID()
function.dummy
: This is a simple test that only logs a message to the console using console.log()
.Options compared
The benchmark compares the performance of these two code snippets across different browsers and devices.
Pros and Cons of each approach:
array include
:dummy
:Library and its purpose
In this benchmark, the self.crypto.randomUUID()
function is used to generate random UUIDs. This function is part of the Web Cryptography API (W3C), which provides a set of cryptographic primitives for JavaScript applications.
Special JS feature or syntax
There is no special JS feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The code snippets are straightforward and do not utilize any advanced features.
Other alternatives
If you wanted to create a similar benchmark, you could consider using other test cases that simulate common use cases in JavaScript development, such as:
Keep in mind that the specific test cases and code snippets used will depend on your goals and target audience.
In terms of alternative benchmarking tools or platforms, MeasureThat.net is a unique platform specifically designed for JavaScript microbenchmarks. Some other popular benchmarking tools and frameworks include:
These tools can be used to create custom benchmarks or tests, but they may not offer the same level of simplicity and ease of use as MeasureThat.net.