Benchmark: Map + Filter (Native vs Ramda)

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

function double(n) {
    return n * 2;
}

function filter(n) {
    return n % 2 === 0
}

var data = [...Array(20)].map((v, idx) => idx);

Tests:

Ramda
R.pipe(R.filter(filter), R.map(double))(data);
Array (native)
data.map(double).filter(filter);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Ramda
Array (native)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 9 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/116.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 116 on Mac OS X 10.15

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Ramda	949053.6 Ops/sec
Array (native)	5192315.0 Ops/sec

Map + Filter (Native vs Ramda) (version: 0)

measures the speed of ramda's map vs Array's native map vs lodash map

Comparing performance of: Ramda vs Array (native)

Created: 9 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Ramda

Array (native)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A