<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.core.js"></script>
var users = [
{ 'user': 'joey', 'age': 32 },
{ 'user': 'ross', 'age': 41 },
{ 'user': 'chandler', 'age': 39 }
]
// Native
users.find(function (o) { return o.age < 40; })
for (let key in users) {
if (users.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
let value = users[key];
if (users[key].age < 40) return users[key];
}
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
array find | |
_.find |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
array find | 148646400.0 Ops/sec |
_.find | 16062472.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmarking test case and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.
What is tested?
The provided benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches:
find
method: This uses JavaScript's built-in Array.prototype.find()
method to find the first element in an array that satisfies a certain condition.for...in
loop with hasOwnProperty
check: This is a manual approach using a for...in
loop and checking if each property exists on the object (using hasOwnProperty
) before accessing it.Options compared
The benchmark compares these two approaches to measure their performance differences.
Pros and Cons of each approach:
find
method:find()
to work (if not, it will return undefined
).for...in
loop with hasOwnProperty
check:find()
due to the overhead of the loop and checks.Library used:
The benchmark includes a reference to Lodash's _
library, specifically lodash.core.js
. This library is not directly involved in the performance comparison but provides additional functionality that might be useful for more complex tasks. In this case, it's likely included as part of the HTML preparation code to enable the use of Lodash's features in the benchmark.
Special JavaScript feature:
There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes used in these tests, other than those inherent to the find()
method and the for...in
loop.
Other alternatives:
If you want to compare performance with alternative methods, consider the following approaches:
Array.prototype.findIndex()
: Similar to Array.prototype.find()
, but returns -1
if no element matches the condition.while
loop: An alternative to the traditional for...in
loop approach.slice()
and indexing: Another way to access elements in an array, potentially with performance differences compared to native find()
or manual loops.Keep in mind that performance differences between these approaches can be significant, especially for large arrays. It's essential to consider the specific requirements of your use case when choosing a method.