Benchmark: Math.round vs bitRound v2

Script Preparation code:

window.roundScale = (val, scale) => { return Math.round(val * scale) / scale; };
window.roundPow = (val, precision) => { const m = 10 ** (precision || 0); return Math.round(val * m) / m; };
window.bitRound = (val, precision) => { const m = 10 ** (precision || 0); return ((((val * m) + 0.5) << 1) >> 1) / m; };

Tests:

roundScale
roundScale(Math.random() * 100, 1000)
roundPow
roundPow(Math.random() * 100, 3)
bitRoundPow
bitRound(Math.random() * 100, 3)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
roundScale
roundPow
bitRoundPow

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 10 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 114 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
roundScale	3662421.0 Ops/sec
roundPow	3578145.0 Ops/sec
bitRoundPow	5620422.0 Ops/sec

Math.round vs bitRound v2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: roundScale vs roundPow vs bitRoundPow

Created: 10 months ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

roundScale

roundPow

bitRoundPow

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A