function a (){}
var a = function(){}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
named | |
anonymous |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
named | 20522972.0 Ops/sec |
anonymous | 20843400.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided benchmark.
Overview
The benchmark is testing two approaches to defining functions in JavaScript: named function expressions and anonymous function expressions.
Options Compared
There are two options being compared:
function
keyword followed by the function name. For example:function foo() {}
var
, let
, or const
keywords with no explicit function declaration. For example:var foo = function() {};
Pros and Cons
Library Usage
None of the provided benchmark test cases use any external libraries.
Special JavaScript Features/Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being used in these benchmark test cases. They only use standard JavaScript basics.
Other Alternatives
If you wanted to add more complexity to this benchmark, you could consider adding additional options, such as:
() => {}
)class
keyword instead of function expressionsvar
, let
, const
)By exploring these additional options, you could gather more insights into how JavaScript engines optimize and execute functions in different scenarios.
For this specific benchmark, it's clear that named function expressions are slightly faster than anonymous function expressions on the provided hardware configuration. This might be due to various reasons such as name lookup or caching optimizations applied by the JavaScript engine.