function A(iterations) {
return new Array(iterations).filter((_, idx) => idx%2 === 0).map((_, idx) => 'hi, i forgot why I am here');
}
function B(iterations) {
const emptyArray = [];
new Array(iterations).forEach((_, idx) => {
if(idx%2===0) {
emptyArray.push('hi, i forgot why I am here');
}
})
return emptyArray;
}
A(1000);
B(1000);
A(1000000);
B(1000000);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
1000 iterations | |
1 mil |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
1000 iterations | 150751.8 Ops/sec |
1 mil | 180.9 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into explaining the benchmark.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents two JavaScript microbenchmarks: A
and B
. Both functions are designed to perform a simple operation on an array of elements, but they use different methods to achieve this. The test case compares the performance of these two approaches:
A
uses the map()
method to create a new array with transformed elements and then applies the filter()
method to filter out every other element. This approach is typically more efficient because it avoids the overhead of creating an intermediate array.B
uses the forEach()
method to iterate over the array, and within each iteration, it checks if the index is even using an if
statement. If the condition is true, it pushes a string element into an empty array.Options being compared
The benchmark compares two versions of the same test case: one that uses Map + Filter (A
) and another that uses ForEach + If (B
). The number of iterations (1000 and 1 million) is also varied to assess performance under different conditions.
Pros and Cons
map()
and filter()
methods.map()
and another for filter()
.forEach()
.Library used
Neither Function A nor Function B relies on any external libraries. The operations are performed using native JavaScript features.
Special JS feature or syntax
There is no special JS feature or syntax explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that some modern JavaScript engines and browsers may provide additional optimizations for specific array methods, such as map()
and forEach()
, which might affect the performance of these benchmarks.
Other alternatives
If you wanted to compare alternative approaches to these benchmarks, some possible options could be:
Please note that each of these alternatives would require significant modifications to the benchmark definition and implementation.