const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' }
const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' }
const finalObject = {
firstObject,
secondObject
};
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' }
const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' }
const finalObject = Object.assign({}, firstObject, secondObject);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Using the spread operator | |
Using Object.assign |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Using the spread operator | 6194193.0 Ops/sec |
Using Object.assign | 11727609.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into explaining the JavaScript microbenchmark you provided.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches to merge two objects: using the spread operator (...
) and Object.assign()
. The test case creates three objects: firstObject
, secondObject
, and finalObject
.
Options Compared
There are two options being compared:
{ ...firstObject, ...secondObject }
to merge the two objects. The spread operator (...
) is used to copy the properties of an object into a new object.Object.assign()
: This approach uses the Object.assign()
method to merge the two objects. It takes two arguments: the target object and an array of source objects.Pros and Cons
Object.assign()
:Library Used
None is explicitly mentioned. The Object.assign()
method is a built-in JavaScript method, which means it's part of the standard library.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
The spread operator (...
) was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) as a new syntax for spreading array elements into an object. It's also known as the rest parameter syntax.
Other Considerations
When deciding between these two approaches, consider the following:
Object.assign()
might be faster due to its optimized implementation.Alternative Approaches
Some other ways to merge objects in JavaScript include:
merge()
method from libraries like Lodash or Underscore.jsObject.assign()
)