Benchmark: jQuery versions Mehman

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.1/jquery.min.js'></script>
<script>
  var $jq171 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src='https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.3/jquery.min.js'></script>
<script>
  var $jq1113 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src='https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js'></script>
<script>
  var $jq1124 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.4/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq224 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq331 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.4.1.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq341 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.1.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq360 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<div>
  <ul id="menu">
    <li class="menu-item">1</li>
    <li class="menu-item">2</li>
    <li class="menu-item">3</li>
    <li class="menu-item">4</li>  
  </ul>
</div>

Script Preparation code:

function tests($) {
    $(".menu-item").eq(2).closest("ul").css({
      "background-color": "red"
    }).parent().css({
      "border": "1px solid blue"
    }).append($("<p></p>").text("Text.").css({
      "background-color": "green"
    })).end().end().remove();
  console.log('tests' + $);
}

Tests:

Test jQuery 1.7.1
tests($jq171);
Test jQuery 1.11.3
tests($jq1113);
Test jQuery 1.12.4
tests($jq1124);
Test jQuery 2.2.4
tests($jq224);
Test jQuery 3.3.1
tests($jq331);
Test jQuery 3.4.1
tests($jq341);
Test jQuery 3.6.0
tests($jq360);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Test jQuery 1.7.1
Test jQuery 1.11.3
Test jQuery 1.12.4
Test jQuery 2.2.4
Test jQuery 3.3.1
Test jQuery 3.4.1
Test jQuery 3.6.0

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring the performance of different versions of jQuery is a crucial task, especially for developers who need to ensure compatibility and optimization across various browsers and environments.

**What's being tested?**

The benchmark measures the execution speed of the `tests()` function for each jQuery version (1.7.1, 1.11.3, 1.12.4, 2.2.4, 3.3.1, 3.4.1, and 3.6.0). The test script prepares a HTML page with an unordered list containing several menu items, and then applies the `tests()` function to each jQuery version using the `$jqX` variables, which are assigned the corresponding jQuery instance.

**Options compared**

The benchmark compares the execution speed of the `tests()` function for each jQuery version. The options being compared are:

* **jQuery version**: Each test case uses a different version of jQuery (1.7.1, 1.11.3, 1.12.4, 2.2.4, 3.3.1, 3.4.1, and 3.6.0).
* **Library conflict resolution**: Each test case uses the `$.noConflict(true)` method to resolve library conflicts between jQuery and other libraries.
* **Browser and platform**: The benchmark is run on Chrome 113 browser on a desktop platform (Windows 10).

**Pros and cons of each approach**

1. **Using different jQuery versions**: This allows developers to compare the performance of different versions of jQuery, which can be useful for ensuring compatibility and optimization across various browsers and environments.
	* Pros: Allows for comparison of different versions, ensures compatibility, and optimizes performance.
	* Cons: May require additional testing and maintenance to ensure compatibility with other libraries and frameworks.
2. **Using library conflict resolution**: This allows developers to isolate the impact of library conflicts on the test results.
	* Pros: Isolates the impact of library conflicts, ensuring accurate test results.
	* Cons: May introduce additional complexity and overhead due to the use of `$.noConflict(true)`.
3. **Running on Chrome 113 browser**: This allows developers to ensure compatibility with a specific browser version and platform.
	* Pros: Ensures compatibility with a specific browser version and platform.
	* Cons: May not be representative of other browsers or platforms.

**Additional observations**

* The benchmark results show that the execution speed of the `tests()` function varies significantly between different jQuery versions. This suggests that some versions may have performance optimizations or bug fixes that impact the test results.
* The results also suggest that the use of library conflict resolution (via `$noConflict(true)`) does not significantly impact the execution speed of the `tests()` function.

Overall, this benchmark provides valuable insights into the performance characteristics of different jQuery versions and helps developers optimize their code for better performance and compatibility.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/113.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 113 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Test jQuery 1.7.1	37484.6 Ops/sec
Test jQuery 1.11.3	38521.5 Ops/sec
Test jQuery 1.12.4	39653.7 Ops/sec
Test jQuery 2.2.4	52492.9 Ops/sec
Test jQuery 3.3.1	54676.8 Ops/sec
Test jQuery 3.4.1	49623.6 Ops/sec
Test jQuery 3.6.0	49631.1 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

jQuery versions Mehman (version: 0)

benchmark different versions of jquery

Comparing performance of: Test jQuery 1.7.1 vs Test jQuery 1.11.3 vs Test jQuery 1.12.4 vs Test jQuery 2.2.4 vs Test jQuery 3.3.1 vs Test jQuery 3.4.1 vs Test jQuery 3.6.0

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Test jQuery 1.7.1

Test jQuery 1.11.3

Test jQuery 1.12.4

Test jQuery 2.2.4

Test jQuery 3.3.1

Test jQuery 3.4.1

Test jQuery 3.6.0

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):