var strings = {};
for (var i=0; i<1000; i++) {
strings[i] = ""+i+i;
}
const URLS = [
{
"title": "USPS",
"url": "https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tLabels="
},
{
"title": "Parcels",
"url": "https://parcelsapp.com/en/tracking/"
},
{
"title": "EVEREST",
"url": "http://everest.forwardex.com/m/track.asp?track="
}
]
URLS.map(url => `<a class="dropdown-item" href="${url.url + 'doc.tracking_number'}" target="_blank">${url.title}</a>`).join('');
const URLS = [
{
"title": "USPS",
"url": "https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tLabels="
},
{
"title": "Parcels",
"url": "https://parcelsapp.com/en/tracking/"
},
{
"title": "EVEREST",
"url": "http://everest.forwardex.com/m/track.asp?track="
}
]
const reduced_urls = URLS.reduce((acc, url) => {
return acc + `<a class="dropdown-item" href="${url.url + 'doc.tracking_number'}" target="_blank">${url.title}</a>`;
}, '');
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
USING MAP and JOIN | |
USING REDUCE |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
USING MAP and JOIN | 3634042.8 Ops/sec |
USING REDUCE | 15451975.0 Ops/sec |
Benchmark Overview
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case on the MeasureThat.net website. The benchmark compares two approaches for transforming an array of objects into a string: using Array.prototype.map()
and Array.prototype.reduce()
. The test is designed to measure the performance difference between these two methods.
Options Compared
Two options are compared in this benchmark:
map()
method to create a new array with transformed elements, and then concatenates the resulting array into a single string using the join()
method.reduce()
method to accumulate the transformed elements into a single string.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Library and Special JS Features
Neither the map()
nor reduce()
methods use any external libraries. However, they do utilize a few special JavaScript features:
map()
method uses arrow functions to define the transformation function.`
) to create string interpolations.Other Considerations
When evaluating performance benchmarks like this one, consider factors such as:
reduce()
approach due to its more efficient memory usage.Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative approaches to transform arrays into strings, consider:
forEach()
to iterate over the array elements and concatenating them using String.prototype.concat()
.toString()
method.