Benchmark: set.has vs. Object key lookup vs array.includes

Script Preparation code:

var a = new Set([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]);
var b = {1: true, 2: true, 3: true, 4: true, 5: true, 6: true, 7: true, 8: true, 9: true, 10: true}
var c = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10];

Tests:

set.has
return a.has(9)
key lookup
return b['9']
array.includes
return c.includes(10);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
set.has
key lookup
array.includes

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/113.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 113 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
set.has	1323560000.0 Ops/sec
key lookup	1229043000.0 Ops/sec
array.includes	34786290.0 Ops/sec

set.has vs. Object key lookup vs array.includes (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: set.has vs key lookup vs array.includes

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

set.has

key lookup

array.includes

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A