var arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
arr[i] = i;
}
function someFn(i) {
return i * 3 * 8;
}
let newArray = []
arr.forEach(function (item){
newArray.push(someFn(item));
})
let newArray = []
for (var i = 0, len = arr.length; i < len; i++) {
newArray.push(someFn(arr[i]));
}
let newArray = arr.map(item => someFn(item))
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
foreach | |
for | |
map |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
foreach | 63922.8 Ops/sec |
for | 170346.9 Ops/sec |
map | 96041.2 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided benchmark.
Overview of the Benchmark
The benchmark measures the performance of three different approaches for executing an array loop:
for
loop that iterates over the array and performs calculations on each element.forEach()
method, which is a more modern and concise way to iterate over arrays in JavaScript.map()
function, which applies a transformation to each element of an array and returns a new array.Options Comparison
The three options are compared to determine which one performs best in terms of speed. Here's a brief overview of each approach:
for
loop with an index variable, which can be slow because it creates a new scope for each iteration.forEach()
): The forEach()
method is called on each element of the array, executing the provided callback function once per iteration. This approach is generally faster than traditional loops because it doesn't require explicit index management.map()
): The map()
function applies a transformation to each element of an array and returns a new array. In this benchmark, the transformation involves multiplying each number by 3 and 8 using the someFn()
function.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
forEach()
): Pros - concise syntax, faster execution; Cons - may not be suitable for all scenarios where explicit control is required.map()
): Pros - concise syntax, fast execution; Cons - requires careful consideration of the transformation function's behavior.Library and Special JavaScript Features
The benchmark uses the following library:
However, it does utilize a special JavaScript feature: the arrow function syntax (=>
).
Arrow Function Syntax
Arrow functions are a concise way to define small functions in JavaScript. They have several advantages over traditional function()
expressions, including:
In this benchmark, the map()
function uses an arrow function (item => someFn(item)
) to transform each element of the array. This syntax is more concise and readable than a traditional function expression.
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring other alternatives for iterating over arrays or performing transformations, here are some options:
reduce()
: The reduce()
method applies a transformation to an accumulator value and returns a new array. It can be used instead of map()
when working with arrays that require more complex calculations.forEach()
or map()
, you can use a traditional loop (e.g., for
loop, while
loop) to iterate over the array and perform calculations.