<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.core.js"></script>
var a = ["ce", "b", "pl", "yqd", "tk", "ife", "wpjo", "ha", "ftic", "cjo", "vxi", "nvrx", "b", "vi", "vpwh", "t", "sfvz", "cndp", "l", "xy", "pkf", "ldwm", "ay", "zly", "xrp", "bora", "wj", "wgq", "ri", "zj", "yeic", "jlin", "qi", "xyi", "find", "some", "wgbr", "w", "xcznm", "rygz", "asgq", "qpw", "awc", "v", "qv", "sr", "lw", "hfr", "ylsl", "iug", "tcbv", "q", "yl", "yu", "w", "mij", "f", "ti", "qpc", "ter", "wjn", "vrjr", "lg", "pwl", "to", "ew", "app", "h", "mhwpb", "dv", "fh", "bvyzx", "me", "ky", "pm", "y", "aok", "a", "bb", "v", "zey", "bloe", "sau", "rqb", "i", "qki", "mzle", "ov", "t", "omdwh", "y", "j", "tffm", "zjp", "w", "xqz", "wg", "gea", "z", "fqd"];
var b = a.find(item => item === 'find');
var a = ["ce", "b", "pl", "yqd", "tk", "ife", "wpjo", "ha", "ftic", "cjo", "vxi", "nvrx", "b", "vi", "vpwh", "t", "sfvz", "cndp", "l", "xy", "pkf", "ldwm", "ay", "zly", "xrp", "bora", "wj", "wgq", "ri", "zj", "yeic", "jlin", "qi", "xyi", "find", "some", "wgbr", "w", "xcznm", "rygz", "asgq", "qpw", "awc", "v", "qv", "sr", "lw", "hfr", "ylsl", "iug", "tcbv", "q", "yl", "yu", "w", "mij", "f", "ti", "qpc", "ter", "wjn", "vrjr", "lg", "pwl", "to", "ew", "app", "h", "mhwpb", "dv", "fh", "bvyzx", "me", "ky", "pm", "y", "aok", "a", "bb", "v", "zey", "bloe", "sau", "rqb", "i", "qki", "mzle", "ov", "t", "omdwh", "y", "j", "tffm", "zjp", "w", "xqz", "wg", "gea", "z", "fqd"];
var b = a.some(item => item === 'some');
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
array find | |
array some |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
array find | 2279631.2 Ops/sec |
array some | 2130547.8 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test case named "array.find() vs. array.some()" that compares the performance of two methods: Array.prototype.find()
and Array.prototype.some()
when used to check if an element exists in an array. The test is run on Firefox 111, running on a Windows desktop platform.
What are we testing?
We're comparing the execution speed of two methods:
Array.prototype.find()
: This method returns the first element in the array that satisfies the provided testing function.Array.prototype.some()
: This method returns true if at least one element in the array satisfies the provided testing function.Options being compared
The two options being compared are:
array.find(item => item === 'find')
array.some(item => item === 'some')
These expressions check for the existence of a specific string ('find' or 'some') in the array using the ===
operator. The find()
method is used to find the first element that matches this condition, while the some()
method returns true if at least one element in the array matches this condition.
Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
array.find()
array.some()
Library usage
The lodash
library is used in both test cases, specifically the lodash.core.js
module. Lodash provides a utility function called some()
that can be used to check if at least one element in an array satisfies a condition.
Special JS features
There's no special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in this benchmark. It's purely about comparing the performance of two built-in methods (find()
and some()
).
Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are some other options:
forEach()
to iterate over the array and check for the condition.Array.prototype.find()
or Array.prototype.some()
method.Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be as performant or readable as using the built-in find()
and some()
methods.