<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@3.0.3/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.29.3/moment.min.js'></script>
luxon.DateTime.fromISO("2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00");
moment("2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00")
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Luxon | |
Moment |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Luxon | 610169.8 Ops/sec |
Moment | 253478.4 Ops/sec |
I'll do my best to explain the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares the performance of two JavaScript libraries: Luxon and Moment.js. Both libraries are used for date and time manipulation, but they have different approaches and use cases.
Library Overview
Test Cases
The benchmark consists of two test cases:
Luxon
: The first test case uses the Luxon library to parse a date string in ISO format using the luxon.DateTime.fromISO()
method.Moment
: The second test case uses the Moment.js library to parse a similar date string using the moment()
function.Options Compared
The benchmark compares two approaches:
fromISO()
method: This method takes a date string in ISO format as input and returns a Luxon DateTime
object.moment()
function: This function takes a date string in ISO format as input and returns a Moment.js object.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
fromISO()
method:moment()
function:Other Considerations
Special JS Features or Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark that require explanation beyond what's provided by the libraries themselves.
Alternatives
Other popular date and time libraries for JavaScript include:
Overall, this benchmark provides a good comparison of two popular libraries for date and time manipulation in JavaScript. The results can help developers choose the best library for their specific use case.