function h1(args) {
return args.map((x)=>x)
}
function h2(args) {
return args.map((x)=>x)
}
const els = h1(1,2,3,4,5);
const els = h1([1,2,3,4,5]);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
rest arguments | |
array parameter |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
rest arguments | 25631960.0 Ops/sec |
array parameter | 29402314.0 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the provided benchmark JSON and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is defined in two parts:
h1
and h2
, which are used to test different approaches. Both functions take a variable number of arguments using the rest parameter syntax (...args
) or the traditional arguments
array.Individual Test Cases
There are two test cases:
**: This test case uses the rest parameter syntax to call
h1with multiple arguments:
const els = h1(1,2,3,4,5);`.**: This test case passes an array as a single argument to
h1:
const els = h1([1,2,3,4,5]);`.What's being tested
The benchmark is testing two approaches:
...args
) to pass multiple arguments to a function.Pros and Cons of each approach
Rest Parameters (e.g., h1(...args)
):
Pros:
Cons:
Traditional arguments
array (e.g., h2(args)
):
Pros:
Cons:
Library usage
The h1
and h2
functions use a library, but its name is not specified in the benchmark. However, based on the code, it appears that this library is providing some utility functions or methods that are being used to test the rest parameter syntax.
Special JavaScript feature/syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark. The focus is solely on testing different approaches to passing arguments to a function.
Other alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are a few options:
apply()
or call()
methods to pass arguments to a functionKeep in mind that the choice of approach ultimately depends on the specific requirements and constraints of your project.