var BITWISE_FEATURE_A = 1;
var BITWISE_FEATURE_B = BITWISE_FEATURE_A<<1;
var BITWISE_FEATURE_C = BITWISE_FEATURE_B<<1;
var BITWISE_ENABLED = BITWISE_FEATURE_A ^ BITWISE_FEATURE_C;
var STRING_FEATURE_A = "yellow_scrollbar";
var STRING_FEATURE_B = "green_box";
var STRING_FEATURE_C = "blue_banner";
var STRING_ENABLED = STRING_FEATURE_A + STRING_FEATURE_C;
BITWISE_ENABLED & BITWISE_FEATURE_A == BITWISE_FEATURE_A
BITWISE_ENABLED & BITWISE_FEATURE_B == BITWISE_FEATURE_B
STRING_ENABLED.indexOf(STRING_FEATURE_C) != -1
STRING_ENABLED.indexOf(STRING_FEATURE_B) != -1
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Bitwise - Existing | |
Bitwise - Non-Existing | |
String - Existing | |
String - Non-Existing |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Bitwise - Existing | 92254696.0 Ops/sec |
Bitwise - Non-Existing | 92684296.0 Ops/sec |
String - Existing | 92073784.0 Ops/sec |
String - Non-Existing | 91427152.0 Ops/sec |
Benchmark Overview
MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark measures the performance of bitwise operations (using <<
and ^
) versus string features in JavaScript.
Script Preparation Code Analysis
The script preparation code defines several variables:
BITWISE_FEATURE_A
, BITWISE_FEATURE_B
, and BITWISE_FEATURE_C
: These are bitwise constants defined using the left shift operator (<<
). The values of these constants are calculated by shifting BITWISE_FEATURE_A
to the left by 1, 2, and 3 bits, respectively.BITWISE_ENABLED
: This variable is set to the result of the bitwise XOR operation between BITWISE_FEATURE_A
and BITWISE_FEATURE_C
. This operation checks whether a specific bit is set in one of the operands.STRING_FEATURE_A
, STRING_FEATURE_B
, and STRING_FEATURE_C
: These are string literals defined using double quotes ("..."
).STRING_ENABLED
: This variable is set to the concatenation of STRING_FEATURE_A
and STRING_FEATURE_C
.The script preparation code sets up two branches:
BITWISE_ENABLED & BITWISE_FEATURE_A == BITWISE_FEATURE_A
BITWISE_ENABLED & BITWISE_FEATURE_B == BITWISE_FEATURE_B
These two branches represent different scenarios: one where the bitwise operation is valid (using BITWISE_FEATURE_A
), and another where it's not valid (using BITWISE_FEATURE_B
).
Test Cases Analysis
There are four test cases in total:
Each test case defines a specific benchmark definition using the JavaScript &&
operator, which evaluates to true
if both operands are truthy.
Library: String.indexOf()
The STRING_ENABLED.indexOf(STRING_FEATURE_C)
function is used in Test Case 3 ("String - Existing"). The indexOf()
method returns the index of the first occurrence of a specified string within a given array. In this case, it's searching for STRING_FEATURE_C
("blue_banner"
) within the concatenated string STRING_ENABLED
.
Special JS Feature/Syntax: None
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark.
Pros and Cons of Different Approaches
The main difference between the two approaches is whether the bitwise operation is valid or not. Here's a brief analysis:
indexOf()
method has to search for a specific string within the concatenated string.Other Alternatives
If you were to modify this benchmark to explore different approaches, here are some alternatives:
String.indexOf()
, you could use regular expressions (RegExp
) to match a specific pattern.+
operator for string concatenation, you could explore other methods like String.prototype.concat()
or template literals.These alternatives would allow you to test the performance of different approaches and evaluate their trade-offs in terms of readability, efficiency, and maintainability.